American AcornsJohn Thomas Ladd
1810–1859 · Male · died at 49
Key to the summaries
- Photos you can view on this site.
- Newspaper items: viewable scans, transcriptions, or references to read at the publisher.
- Other records: census, certificates, directories and others, counted the same way. A citation is not a scan.
- A written story or biography about the person, not a list of facts.
- A linked Find a Grave memorial.
Male or Female is the sex recorded in the family tree file, not a description of gender; it is left out where the tree does not record it. Age at death is worked out from the dates shown: exact when both dates are exact, otherwise a range (73 or 74) or “about”. It is left out when a date is missing, open-ended or conflicting, or when the dates would make someone older than 110, and when the research has labelled one of the dates Unconfirmed. People who may be living have no summary.
Family data snapshot: 09-24-2026 Read-only collection from the Oak Family Tree. Research incorporated 09-25-2026 (revision 90e7f7b2). Updated periodically.
Overview
Family
Parents
- Mother: Abigail Prowse 1789–1863
Unconfirmed evidence: show why
- Father: John Ladd 1786–1824
Unconfirmed evidence: show why
Wife: Sarah Jane Nourse 1818–1892 Unconfirmed evidence: show why
Unconfirmed evidence: show why
- Daughter: Martha J. Radcliffe 1839–1915
Unconfirmed evidence: show why
Life events
| Born | 9 JAN 1810, Hallowell, Kennebec, Maine, United States Unconfirmed evidence: show why |
|---|---|
| Died | 11 OCT 1859, Honolulu, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA Unconfirmed evidence: show why |
Photos & documents
Living relatives, and relatives whose living status is uncertain, appear here by name only or not at all. Family members can sign in for them and for photos, documents and records that are not public.
From the family tree, with the research incorporated so far. Each relationship and main fact carries a label: Confirmed, Likely or Unconfirmed. Tree entries that nobody has reviewed yet are Unconfirmed. Open a label to see why, the records and when it was reviewed. How sure is each statement?